Search Results for "duty paid"

6691 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6691 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Interest Under Section 11AB Cannot Be Waived. Mandatory Interest Provision Requires Payment of Interest on Delayed Duty Even if Penalty Is Waived.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs) against an order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute. Customs duty under Section 150(2)(c) of Customs Act, 1962 has priority over warehouse charges under Section 150(2)(d) in distribution of sale proceeds of warehoused goods.

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (appellant) and M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd. (respondent) regarding the priority of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...