Search Results for "discretionary orders"

1959 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1959 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging COFEPOSA Detention Orders on Grounds of Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds Must Be Raised in Earlier Petitions or Are Barred.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders of detention passed under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Customs for Demurrage Charges Due to Delay in Assessment. Customs Department Directed to Bear Warehousing Charges for Inordinate Delay in Finalising Assessment of Imported Goods.

The petitioner, Apollo Paper Mills Ltd., imported second-hand machinery from the UK in 1995 to set up a paper manufacturing unit in Gujarat, seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Interim Application in Partition Suit Over Alleged HUF Properties. Plaintiff Seeks Injunction and Appointment of Court Receiver Pending Suit, Claiming Undivided Share Despite 2001 Affidavit Acknowledging Properties as Self-Acquired.

The present order arises from an Interim Application filed by the plaintiff, Variinder @ Rajan, in Suit No. 343 of 2022 before the High Court of Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...