Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

308 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 308 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MSRTC's Petition in Driver's Disciplinary Case, Upholds Setting Aside of Penalty but Reduces Back Wages. Acquittal in Criminal Case Under Bombay Prohibition Act Does Not Automatically Exonerate Employee, But Penalty Must Be Proportionate to Misconduct.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, which partly allowed the complaint fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court's Preliminary Finding on Fairness of Domestic Enquiry in Service Dispute. Enquiry Not Vitiated by Alleged Victimization or Bias as Labour Court's Decision Was Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

The petitioner, Shri Tanaji Shankar Anuse, was employed as a Junior Clerk by the respondent, Maharashtra Rajya Doodh Sahakari Mahasangh Maahanand Dudh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Trap Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Reinstated with Back Wages as Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Unsubstantiated Trap and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri M.S. Kadkol, was a government employee who was dismissed from service based on a trap case. The trap was laid on a complaint dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Electrician in Departmental Enquiry Case — Punishment Disproportionate to Misconduct. Fire Incident Due to Short Circuit Not Attributable to Employee Negligence; Absence Without Leave Not Proved.

The petitioner, Akhil Ahmad, was appointed as an Electrician in the Agriculture Department and posted at Parbhani. He was subjected to a departmental ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order as Stigmatic and Invalid. Order of compulsory retirement based on allegations of misconduct without proper inquiry is punitive and stigmatic, requiring prior opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, J.K. Lonakar, joined the service of the respondent, Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, a government-owned company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...