Search Results for "debenture holders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "debenture holders"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Company Applications for Recall of Attachment and Leave to Sell Property in Winding-Up of BPL Engineering Limited. Issues Raised Include Whether SARFAESI Act Overrides Tax Department's Statutory First Charge under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act.

2 Jul 2026

The matter pertained to competing claims over an immovable property of BPL Engineering Limited (in liquidation), situated at Pashamylaram Village, San...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

19 Dec 2024

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Companies Act and SEBI Regulations Jurisdiction Dispute. The court held that rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is summary and not for contested facts, and SEBI has exclusive jurisdiction over violations of its regulations, not the National Company Law Tribunal.

4 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal concerning the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Landlord Not Necessary Party in Tenant's Suit Against Corporation for Demolition. The test for necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC is whether the suit outcome affects the legal interest of the landlord, which is not satisfied when the tenant seeks to restrain demolition of the tenanted premises.

14 Dec 2021

The judgment involves four writ petitions where the common question is whether the owner/landlord of the suit premises is a necessary or proper party ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Winding Up Petition Despite DRT Decree — Recovery of Debts Act Does Not Bar Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act. Secured Creditor Need Not Relinquish Security Before Admission of Winding Up Petition; Election Arises Only After Winding Up Order Under Section 529 Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2019

The case involves the right of a secured creditor, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., to file a winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956, after having...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employee to Maintain Winding Up Petition as Creditor for Unpaid Salary Under Companies Act, 1956. Employee's claim for unpaid wages constitutes a debt under section 433(e) read with section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956, entitling him to file a winding up petition as a creditor.

22 Mar 2017

The judgment addresses a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court on the question whether an employee can maintain a winding up petition u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

23 Aug 2013

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)