Search Results for "dangerous activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Properly Recorded and Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated in Time.

26 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Nitin Bhimabhai Patel, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA Act) by orders dated 14/03/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Social Activist for Lack of Material and Non-Compliance with Section 59 of Bombay Police Act. The court held that a single FIR and vague allegations are insufficient to justify externment under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Prashant Mahadeorao Bodakhe, a 28-year-old student and social activist working for tribal rights, challenged an externment order passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Grant of Bail in Similar Cases. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Based on Relevant Material Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

28 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Rohit Kesrinath Patil @ Dappu, challenged a detention order dated 6th January 2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Preventio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's custody and the delay in passing the order vitiated the subjective satisfaction.

23 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Samad Salim Khan, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under Section 3(2) of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Judicial Custody — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedy Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that a preventive detention order cannot be sustained when the detenu is already in custody and the detaining authority fails to consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies such as cancellation of bail.

4 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sagar Prakash Bhosale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 1 June 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of Incamera Statements. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Petitioner's Bail Status and Failed to Verify Incamera Statements.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale, challenged a detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Detenu's Writ Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act — Detention Order Quashed for Non-Application of Mind and Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. The court held that the detaining authority must consider whether ordinary law is sufficient and cannot mechanically pass a detention order when the detenu is already in custody.

13 May 2011

The petitioner, Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offende...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Anonymous Complaint and Stale Incidents Insufficient to Sustain Preventive Detention. The court held that reliance on an unverified anonymous complaint and two criminal cases where the detenu was on bail did not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

25 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged a detention order dated 25-2-2004 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous A...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)