High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "court holiday"
280 result(s) found
Found 280 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Rejection of Bid for Suppression of Material Facts in Public Tender. Bidder's Failure to Disclose FIR and Charge Sheet for Bridge Collapse Constitutes Fraudulent Practice Under N.I.T. Clauses.
8 Sep 2020The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against a High Court judgment that had set aside the rejection of U.P. State B...
- 184
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Religious Endowments Case — Commissioner Not a Court, Section 5 Limitation Act Not Applicable. Delay Condonation by Commissioner Under Section 69 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 Set Aside as Commissioner Lacks Power to Apply Section 5 of Limitation Act.
3 May 2019The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the right to receive first respect as an Ambalam in a village in Tamil Nadu. The appellant, Ganesan, throug...
- 453
High Court
Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.
1 Nov 2018The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Nomination of Non-OBC Members to Municipal Council. Holds That Section 47 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 Does Not Require Nominated Members to Belong to OBC Category.
4 Oct 2018The petitioner, Jagdish Samanpelliwar, filed four writ petitions challenging the nomination of respondents 4 in each petition as members of the Kinwat...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.
18 Jan 2017The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Criminal Cases Not Considered. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's bail status vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.
18 Jan 2017The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26 April 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Unsuccessful Plaintiff's Regular Second Appeal in Recovery Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court upheld concurrent findings that the suit for recovery of money filed beyond the period of limitation under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was not maintainable.
4 Jul 2016The appellant, Sanna Mallappa, was the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of money filed against the respondent, R.P. Siddeshwarappa, in the Court of Ci...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India renders detention order invalid.
22 Dec 2014The petitioner, father of the detenu Chirag D. Shah, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preven...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Daily Wager Not Entitled to Reinstatement for Failure to Complete 240 Days Service. The court held that the workman did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the 12 months preceding retrenchment, and thus the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with backwages was perverse and unsustainable.
7 Oct 2005The petitioner, M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged the award of the First Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No.36 of 1990, which directed reinst...
- 18
