Search Results for "court fees valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court fees valuation"

494 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 494 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee in Suit for Annulment of Compromise Decree. Court Fee Refund Granted Under Section 66(2)(a) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 When Compromise Decree Is Set Aside.

30 Jun 2021

The petitioners, L. Dayananda Reddy and Gayathri D., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case Against SEBI. Regulatory fees collected under SEBI Act, 1992 are statutory levies, not consideration for taxable service under Finance Act, 1994.

13 Mar 2023

The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East, filed an appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — District Judge Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Valuation Issue Without Pleading or Prejudice.

8 Feb 2023

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed suits before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Nashik, seeking possession of suit property and compensation/mesne ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue's Appeal Against Tribunal's Direction to Use Municipal Rateable Value for Determining Annual Letting Value Under Section 23(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court Examines Whether Comparable Market Instances or Municipal Valuation Should Prevail When Property Is Not Subject to Rent Control Legislation.

8 Aug 2014

The matter comprised multiple income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging common orders of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order on Valuation of Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Court Holds That Order on Valuation of Suit Is a Procedural Order Not Affecting Rights and Liabilities, Hence Not Revisable Under Section 34(4) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

1 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Narayan Lachmandas Mathreja, granted a license to the respondent, M/s Savanah Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., to use premises at Galaxy Garden,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Returning Plaint in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Court Fee Valuation Determines Jurisdiction, Not Market Value of Property. Dispute pertained to suit for possession and mesne profits where trial court ordered return of plaint for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction based on market value, but High Court held that under Section 7(v) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, court fee is payable on the amount claimed as mesne profits, and jurisdiction is determined by that valuation.

7 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed by the defendants (M/s Vasudeva Rao & Sons and its partner) challenging a common order dated 12.3....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit Challenging Deed of Additional Right of Way. Court holds that valuation for jurisdiction is determined by the plaintiff's valuation in the plaint, and the City Civil Court cannot go beyond the plaint allegations to determine pecuniary jurisdiction under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.

9 Nov 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 12 October 2022 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, allowing Notice of Motion No. 1797/2021 filed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction on Ground of Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Dispute Under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

24 Mar 2021

The case involves an appeal filed by Zuberahmed Maqbool Ansari (original Defendant No.2) against an ad-interim order dated 24.09.2020 passed by a lear...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of 75% Court Fee on Unconditional Withdrawal of Appeal Before Commencement of Hearing Under Section 66(2)(c) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Appellant Entitled to Refund as Withdrawal Was Unconditional and Before Hearing Commenced.

6 Jun 2018

The appellant, Sri Jagadeeshaiah, filed Regular First Appeal No.1475/2014 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Court Receiver's 1% Commission on Gross Sale Proceeds in Arbitration Matter — Receiver's Commission Not Subject to Deduction of Expenses. The Court held that the Court Receiver is entitled to 1% commission on the gross sale proceeds without deduction of expenses incurred by the receiver, as per the Bombay High Court (Court Receiver) Rules, 2012.

6 Oct 2015

The appellant, L & T Finance Limited, had advanced a loan of Rs 32,40,000 to AGT Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for purchase of two vehicles under a loan-cu...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)