Search Results for "contract modification"

493 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Co-operative Bank Appeal Against Sureties -- Holds Sureties Liable for Original Loan Under Section 133 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Gujarat High Court Order Set Aside in Recovery Dispute

The Supreme Court allowed appeal by Appellant against High Court order that discharged sureties from all liability -- The Court held that under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Determination of jurisdictional limits and appropriateness of damages in contractual disputes.

Legal case involving the Municipal Committee, Katra, and a bidder, the respondent, regarding a contract for supplying mules and labor for pilgrim tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Case — Directors Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Company Loan. Guarantors Cannot Raise Defences of Principal Debtor Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds TDS Provisions Under Goa VAT Act for Works Contracts — Rule 4A and Entry C-14 Held Valid. Amendment to Section 28(1) of Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for deduction of tax at source from payments to contractors is constitutionally valid and not ultra vires.

The petitioners, including the All Goa Contractors Association and four contractor companies, challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 4A insert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...