Search Results for "consumer representation"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Compensation Appeal in Electrocution Death Case — Father Awarded ₹5 Lakhs for Negligence of Electricity Board. Failure to Maintain Power Lines Causing Death of College Student Attracts Strict Liability Under Section 161 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The appellant, Pandurang S/o Bhimayya Ainapure, a farmer aged 60, lost his 20-year-old college-going son Srinivas due to electrocution on 24.09.2000. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by UP Housing Board, Sets Aside NCDRC Order Directing Allotment of Flat at Rs 2,50,000. Mere Registration Under Housing Scheme Does Not Confer Right to Allotment; Consumer Forum Cannot Compel Public Authority to Enter into Contract at Arbitrary Price.

The appellant, UP Housing and Development Board, floated a scheme for Economically Weaker Sections in 1982. The respondent deposited Rs 500 in 1982 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Restoring Fair Price Shop Licence in Absence of Notice to Complainant. Revision Filed by Licencee Allowed Without Hearing Complainant Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Shashikant Ghadge, along with other villagers, complained to the Tahsildar about mismanagement and irregularities by respondent No.5, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...