Search Results for "construction activity"

1520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction in CRZ Area - Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Notification and Environmental Laws. Construction of jetty and retaining wall in CRZ-I area without prior approval from MoEF and GCZMA held illegal and directed to be demolished.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of a jetty and other s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of NOC Requirement from Naval Authorities for Slum Rehabilitation Project. Security Guidelines and Stop Work Notice Challenged as Arbitrary and Without Statutory Backing.

The petitioners, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Notification Restricting Construction Near Protected Monuments. Court Holds Rules Framed under Section 38 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 Are Intra Vires, but Does Not Decide Validity of Notification in Available Text.

The High Court of Bombay heard four writ petitions together concerning the validity of a notification dated 16.6.1992 issued under the Ancient Monumen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Upon Legality of Hotel Construction in Coastal Regulation Zone III Area Without Mandatory Ministry Approval. Developers Allegedly Built in No Development Zone Without Necessary MEF Clearance Despite CRZ Notification Requiring Prior Approval.

Background: The petitioners, two public interest organizations, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of a hotel in Goa by respondent nos....