Search Results for "constable/driver"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Breach of Policy Terms - Private Jeep Used for Hire and Reward Without Permit

The New India Assurance Company Limited appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhule, in M.A.C.P. No. 873 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Non-Communication of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Dinesh Palyekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

43994

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 06.10.2007, which upheld convictions and senten...