Search Results for "consent immaterial"

571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocate in Sexual Harassment Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Section 354A IPC. Mere sending of messages and a proposal without physical contact or explicit demand for sexual favour does not constitute sexual harassment under the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner, an advocate, sought quashing of FIR No.570 of 2019 registered at Cidco Police Station, Aurangabad, under Sections 354A, 354D, 506, 509...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Rape Case Based on Birth Certificate Proving Victim Below 16 Years. Consent of Minor Irrelevant Under Section 375 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Raju Deorao Bhurse against his conviction for rape under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC. Minor's Age Proved by School Leaving Certificate and Oral Evidence, Consent Irrelevant for Rape Under Indian Penal Code.

The case arose from a criminal appeal filed by the appellant-accused challenging his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 363, 366, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by GPA Holder Without Authority Declared Void. Court holds that a General Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of immovable property and that the burden of proving authority lies on the party relying on the GPA.

The case involves a regular first appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2012 in O.S.No.2405/2010 passed by the XI...