Search Results for "care taker"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "care taker"

71 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 71 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises where courts below have concurrently held that plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and that suit property was self-acquired by defendant.

10 Jul 2023

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff N.L. Manjunatha, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Look Out Circular Issued by Bank of Baroda Against Petitioner in Loan Default Case — LOC Held Invalid as Bank is Not a 'Competent Authority' Under the 2021 SOP. The Court Declared that a Look Out Circular can only be issued by a 'Competent Authority' as defined in the Office Memorandum dated 22.02.2021, and a bank does not qualify as such.

16 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Mr. Himayath Ali Khan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Look Out Circular (...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Declaration — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Article 226. The court upheld the declaration of respondents as Mundkars under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of the Deputy Collector and Administrative Tribunal.

7 Jul 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Krishna Vithoba Xete Tilve, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bomba...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Holds That Right of a Mundkar in a Dwelling House Is Heritable Under Section 3 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court interpreted the definition of 'mundkar' to include family members and held that the right to occupy a dwelling house passes to legal heirs upon death.

18 Dec 2013

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which were heard together to decide the issue of the extent of heri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell by Minor's Guardian Without Court Permission Under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

16 Aug 2013

The appellant, Kasturbai Himmat Patil, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the original defendant Lilabai Patil, alleging that L...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Wrongful Restraint Under Section 341 IPC — Landlords Restricting Vehicle Entry into Private Premises Does Not Constitute Wrongful Restraint. The court held that preventing vehicles from entering a private compound does not amount to wrongful restraint under Section 339 IPC as the complainant had no legal right to bring vehicles into the premises.

29 Jun 2010

The petitioners, Bharat Kishormal Shah, Hemant Shashikant Mehta, and Kiran Shankar Kamble, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Defendants' Writ Petition in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Issues of Mundkarship and Tenancy Not Referable to Mamlatdar as They Are Not Substantial and Triable by Civil Court.

15 Apr 2010

The case involves a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendants (petitioners) in respect of a p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Registration Orders Under Goa Mundkars Act. Concurrent findings of fact that respondent was a mundkar in possession for over 35 years upheld.

8 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Smt. Thereza Cordo, challenged the orders of the Mamlatdar of Bardez, the Additional Collector, and the Administrative Tribunal under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FERA Violation in Foreign Exchange Remittance Case. Directors and Company Held Liable for Making Payment to Non-Resident Without RBI Permission Under Section 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(d) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.

31 Jul 2006

The case involves three appeals filed by Associated Capsules Private Limited and its two directors, Jasjit Singh and Ajit Singh, against an order of t...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)