Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Trap Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand Murlidhar Salvi, was a Senior Clerk in the office of the Executive Engineer, Implementation Wing, Town Planning, Yerwada, Pune. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Peon in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Demand for Rs.300 for Certified Copies Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Raju Shantaram Kakphale, a peon in the Thane District Court, was convicted by the Special Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 7 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Harishchandra Mandalik, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ghanshyam Hari Pagare, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Nashik, in Special Case No.4 of 1993 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Expiry of Contractual Appointment. Applicant's status as public servant under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ceased after contractual term ended on 31.3.2015, prior to alleged bribe demand on 29.7.2015.

The applicant, Mangesh Prabhakar Rathod, a doctor, was appointed as a psychiatrist on a contractual basis with the District Civil Surgeon's office fro...