Search Results for "bootleggers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "bootleggers"

313 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 313 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

7 May 2026

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Under Goonda Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the detenu's bail applications and did not provide relevant documents to the detenu, violating procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

16 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Sangeeta Sunkrol, wife of the detenu Satish @ Market Satya, filed a writ petition for habeas corpus challenging the detention ord...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegging Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as grounds did not show that ordinary law was insufficient to prevent the detenu from acting prejudicially.

12 Jul 2024

The petitioner, wife of Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detenti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Grant of Bail in Similar Cases. The court held that failure to consider the possibility of bail in similar cases vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

29 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Vaibhav @ Pintya Bharat Mane, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 23.11.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu Already in Judicial Custody — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Remedy Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that a preventive detention order cannot be sustained when the detenu is already in custody and the detaining authority fails to consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic remedies such as cancellation of bail.

4 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Sagar Prakash Bhosale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 1 June 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. Preventive detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail application and did not adequately link the alleged activities to disturbance of public order.

11 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Rashid @ Jagga Shaukat Hussein Sayyed, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 September 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wrongful Preventive Detention Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Detention Order Invalid for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Public Order. The court held that the absence of subjective satisfaction in the detention order rendered it invalid, entitling the petitioner to compensation for the period of detention.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Yuvraj Ramchandra Pawar, was detained under an order dated 2nd December 2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Satara, under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Petitioner in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Court held that detaining authority failed to demonstrate compelling reasons or imminent possibility of bail, rendering detention order illegal.

24 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Fazal Sikandar Patel, challenged a detention order dated 26.08.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad under Section 3(1...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)