Search Results for "bonus liability"

167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue's Assessment Under Section 44D of Income-tax Act Despite Income Not Being Taxable at Time of Asset Transfer. Partners of Firm That Transferred Assets to Non-Resident Corporation Assessable on Corporation's Income as They Acquired Right to Enjoy Income by Means of Transfer.

The case arose from a dispute under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 concerning the assessment of partners of a firm that had transferred assets to a n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Liquidator. Recovery Certificate for Rs.4,44,216/- upheld as compromise was validly entered into and not challenged.

The Petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court reviews dismissal of writ petition in EPF liability case concerning cooperative bank and pigmy agents. Bank challenges applicability of Indian Banks Association precedent to EPF Act context.

The Pachora Peoples' Cooperative Bank Ltd. filed a Review Application seeking to recall the order dated 07.02.2014 passed in Writ Petition No.5086/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...