Search Results for "asset reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "asset reconstruction"

366 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against DRT Order Rejecting Stay of Possession Under Securitisation Act — Section 31(j) Not Applicable to IFCI as It Is Not a Financial Institution Under State Financial Corporations Act.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Citron Infraprojects Limited and its director, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the De...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor — Petitioner Failed to Avail Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Before Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act is available, and directed the petitioner to approach the DRT.

30 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Bhushan Ramesh Bramgankar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

30 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions by Financial Institutions Seeking Police Protection for Secured Asset Recovery Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Section 14 of SARFAESI Act Does Not Oust Writ Jurisdiction and That Police Authorities Must Provide Assistance for Recovery of Possession of Secured Assets.

27 Apr 2023

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by financial institutions seeking police protection for recovery of possession of secured assets unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Court Deposits by Former Employee Despite Appellant's CIRP — Section 14 IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Withdrawal of Pre-CIRP Deposits Made by Corporate Debtor. The court held that the deposit made by the corporate debtor as a condition for stay of execution is not an asset of the corporate debtor and is not covered by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

4 Jan 2023

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Rajendra Prasad Bansal (respondent in the First Appeal) seeking withdrawal of monies deposited by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Upholding High Court Order Setting Aside District Magistrate's Decision. District Magistrate's Role Under Section 14 is Limited to Assisting Secured Creditor in Taking Possession, Not Adjudicating Tenancy Disputes, and Tenant's Remedy Lies Under Section 17 Before Debt Recovery Tribunal.

26 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Section 7 IBC Application by State Bank of India Against Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited — Limitation Extended by Acknowledgment in Balance Sheet Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. The Court set aside NCLT and NCLAT orders that had rejected the application as time-barred, holding that acknowledgments of debt, including in balance sheets, can extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Apr 2022

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the State Bank of India (SBI) against the rejection of its application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against DIC and Sales Tax Department for Refusing Transfer of Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Sales Tax Dues. The court held that the auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act acquires clear title free from prior encumbrances, and the DIC cannot insist on NOC from Sales Tax for transfer of property.

18 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Medineutrina Pvt. Ltd., purchased an immovable property (plot no.206, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur) in an auction conducted by Punjab Nation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)