Search Results for "armed forces tribunal"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Management Appeals in Double Overtime Allowance Case for Supervisors. Supervisors Not Entitled to Double Over Time Allowance Under Service Rules.

The case pertains to a dispute over the entitlement of Double Over Time Allowance to employees working as Supervisors in the Security Printing & Minti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Land Reforms Act Case — Tenancy Rights Not Established Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. Land Tribunal's Order Based on Surrender Deemed Invalid as Surrender by Non-Tenant Has No Legal Effect Under Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the order of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Army Disciplinary Jurisdiction, Sets Aside High Court Stay on Attachment Order. High Court's Pre-emptive Intervention in Army Discipline Under Army Act 1950 and Army Instructions 30/86 Held Unwarranted as Respondent Was Posted Outside Its Territorial Jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India and others against the interim orders of the High Court of Manipur dated 5 November 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...