Search Results for "area parking plan"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exemption Order Under ULC Act Due to Reservation in Development Plan — Petitioner Failed to Implement Scheme Despite Exemption, No Ground for Modification After Repeal of ULC Act.

The petitioner, Smt. Sitabai Ramchandra Lonkar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Nariman Point Car Parking Project Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as an appeal.

The petitioners, Nariman Point Association and another, filed a review petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the...