Search Results for "arbitrator impartiality"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Power of Review Under Arbitration Act. Review petition against judgment setting aside arbitral award dismissed as Arbitration Act is a self-contained code with no review provision, and Section 5 limits judicial intervention.

The review petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., sought recall of the judgment dated 8 November 2019 in Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Salvor's Claims for Idling Charges in Salvage Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that salvor failed to prove breach of contract and damages, and that claims were barred by accord and satisfaction.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Prior Conciliation Under MSMED Act, 2006 — Council's Failure to Refer to Arbitration Does Not Bar Court's Power

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, had entered into a contract with t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator for Micro Enterprise Against Central Railway Under MSMED Act, 2006. Conciliation Failed, Arbitration Agreement Exists, Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and a micro enterprise under the Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Rescission and Quantification of Damages Are Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a construction contract dispute. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Section 34 Arbitration Petition — Delay in Filing Amendment Not Fatal as Amendment Only Clarified Existing Grounds Without Causing Prejudice.

The petitioner, Inox Leisure Limited, challenged an order dated 07/09/2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Panaji, which allowed an amendment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery Case. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, finding no grounds for interference.

The petitioners, Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited and two individuals, were original respondents in an arbitration proceeding initiated by New ...