Search Results for "arbitrary restriction"

898 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 898 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioners, K.K. Bhaskaran and Sarjeet Singh, were working as Junior Engineers in the Electrical Department of the Administration of Union Territ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Rule 4(2)(a) of Karnataka Pre-University Education Rules, 2006 Requiring Prior Approval for Opening New Pre-University Colleges. Education Trust's Challenge Dismissed as Rule is Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

The appellant, Chetana Education Trust, an education trust established to provide education to children in Karnataka, had established 13 pre-universit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MMRDA's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Powai Land Development Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's interpretation of tripartite agreement regarding lease premium and development charges under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an arbitration petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) and the State of Maharashtra under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Tender Condition Preferring State-Registered Tank Trucks in LPG Transportation Contracts. Transporters Challenged Preference Given to State-Registered Tank Trucks as Arbitrary and Violative of Section 46 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioners, transporters from Gujarat, challenged a condition in the e-tender floated by Indian Oil Corporation Limited for Bulk LPG transportati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...