Search Results for "agriculturists"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "agriculturists"

382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Entries Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Rights Restored as Ex-Parte Cancellation Without Notice Held Illegal Under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, 227 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Thakkar Yogeshbhai Amritlal, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging multi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Review Petition Due to Unexplained Delay of 1679 Days. Condonation of Delay Denied as Limitation Expired Before COVID-19 Pandemic and No Sufficient Cause Shown.

14 Oct 2024

The State of Maharashtra and others filed a Review Petition (Stamp) No. 19950 of 2022 seeking review of a judgment dated 15 November 2017 in Writ Peti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Water Channel Dispute — No Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding right to draw water from a channel cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of CPC unless perverse.

5 Apr 2016

The dispute arose between neighbouring landholders regarding a water channel that existed on the northern side of the plaintiff's suit schedule proper...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

9 Nov 2015

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Creditor's Full Decree, Clarifying 'Same Creditor' Requirement Under Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act. Renewal of Promissory Note in Favour of Bank Controlled by Original Creditor Fails to Meet Identity Requirement Under Explanation III to Section 8 of the Act.

6 Jan 1966

The litigation originated from a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note executed by the appellant, K. V. Srinivasa Ayyangar, in favour ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)