RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "agricultural equipments"
75 result(s) found
Found 75 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Seizure and Fine in Minor Mineral Transport Case — Tractor Carrying Murum for Filling Potholes Not Illegal Mining. Use of Tractor for Personal Purpose Without Royalty Receipt Does Not Attract Penalty Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
14 Dec 2022The petitioners, Prakash Tumdu Chaudhari and Sujit Prakash Gujrati, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 205
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Rioting Under IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused Persons for Forming Unlawful Assembly, Committing Murder of Krishnappa, and Causing Injuries to PWs, Based on Evidence of Interested Witnesses and Recoveries.
17 Mar 2021The judgment pertains to a set of criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 2 to 8 against their conviction and sentence by the IV Additional District an...
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
10 Sep 2020The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.
21 Feb 2018The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka, Gulbarga Bench, hears appeal against part decree in O.S. No. 125/2004 granting specific performance of oral agreement for sale.
19 Dec 2014The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of industrial property. The plaintiff (respondent No. 1)...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Electricity Companies in Banana Crop Damage Case. Negligence in Maintenance of High Voltage Lines Leads to Compensation for Loss of 20,500 Plants.
26 Jul 2011The case arises from a first appeal filed by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (now trifurcated into three companies) against a judgment and dec...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, recovery, and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.
7 Jan 2010The appellant, Gopal Bodhuram Gurjar, was convicted by the first Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his uncle Sonbabu @ Sonpal...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Appellate Authority's Order Limiting Assessment Period for Unauthorised Use of Electricity to Three Months Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by imposing a limitation not provided for in the Act.
27 Jul 2006The petitioners, Reliance Energy Limited and its shareholder, challenged the order dated 18.3.2005 passed by the Chief Engineer (Electrical), PWD Depa...
- 168
