Search Results for "advertisement rights"

1037 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1037 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Film Production Expenditure Disallowance Case. Expenditure on Positive Prints and Advertisement for Film 'KAAL' Held Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Rule 9A Does Not Exclude General Deduction Provision.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to the assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order Due to Defective Advertisement Under Rule 99 of Company Court Rules, 1959. Failure to Advertise in Correct Name of Company Violates Mandatory Requirement and Cannot Be Cured by Inherent Powers.

The appeal challenged an order dated 21 June 2018 by which the learned Company Judge allowed Company Petition No. 829 of 2003 filed by SICOM Limited f...