Search Results for "adjustments"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Filing of Revised Income Tax Returns After Due Date in Amalgamation Case — Holds That NCLT-Approved Scheme Overrides Procedural Timelines Under Income Tax Act. Clause 64(c) of the Scheme Permitting Revised Returns Has Statutory Force and Department Cannot Reject Them as Invalid.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Dalmia Power Limited and M/s Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited against the judgment of the Division Be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of GSTR-1 in GST Case Due to Human Error and No Revenue Loss. Rule of purposive interpretation applied to permit correction of inadvertent reporting of wrong GSTINs under Section 37 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Star Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing and supplying electronic components to Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL). D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...