Search Results for "adhyaksha"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "adhyaksha"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing FIR in IPC Offences Case - Investigation Must Proceed. High Court's reasoning that FIR was quashed due to complainant's motive against Grama Panchayat Adhyaksha was held untenable as FIR registration mandates investigation under criminal procedure.

17 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against a High Court judgment that had quashed an FIR registered for offences under Sections 420, 468, 465 and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice issued by Assistant Commissioner without verifying signatures and without giving 15-day clear notice period held invalid.

31 May 2022

The petitioner, Smt. Sharadabai, was elected as the Adhyaksha (President) of Nagathibasapura Gram Panchayat on 04.02.2021. She challenged a notice dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Zila Panchayat No-Confidence Motion Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Secrecy of Ballot Waiver Issue. The Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the no-confidence motion solely on the ground of violation of secrecy of ballot without considering the principle of voluntary waiver by voters.

19 Jun 2020

The case arises from a no-confidence motion moved against the Adhyaksha (Chairperson) of the Zila Panchayat, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Sixty-four out ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Against No-Confidence Motion in Gram Panchayat — Upholds Single Judge Order Refusing to Interfere with Motion Proceedings Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised to stall a no-confidence motion at the notice stage before it is moved and voted upon.

8 Mar 2019

The case pertains to a challenge against a notice of no-confidence motion issued by members of the Gram Panchayat, Sangankall, against the Adhyaksha (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Gram Panchayat No-Confidence Motion — Upholds Single Judge Order Refusing to Interfere with Motion Process Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that writ jurisdiction should not be used to stultify the democratic process of a no-confidence motion before it is actually moved and voted upon.

8 Mar 2019

The appellants, Smt. Parvathi (Adhyaksha) and Smt. Yerremma (Upadhyaksha) of Gram Panchayat Sangankall, Ballari, filed writ petitions before a Single ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disqualification of Councilors for Violating Party Whip in Municipal Election — Procedural Lapses and Lack of Opportunity to Show Cause Render Disqualification Order Invalid. The court held that disqualification under the Karnataka Local Authorities (Disqualification of Defection) Act, 1987 requires strict compliance with natural justice and proof of valid whip.

29 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Smt. Hemalata Suguresh Nagaloti and Sri. Hussainsab Shamidsab Bhagwan, were elected councilors of the City Municipal Council, Ilkal, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Election Notification for Non-Compliance with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections) Rules, 1993. Petitioner Failed to Establish That He Was a Voter in the Ward for Which He Sought to Contest, Leading to Dismissal of Petition.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Mr. M. Ananda, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, c...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)