Search Results for "Workers’ Dues"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Workers’ Dues"

434 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Novartis India Ltd. in Transfer Dispute. Medical Sales Representative Held to be Workman Concerned Under Section 33(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

21 Dec 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Novartis India Ltd. challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal on a complaint under Section 33-A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope of Incidental Issues in Computation of Benefits. The court held that the Labour Court can decide incidental issues such as interpretation of settlements when computing benefits under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the workman's right to continuity of service had been established.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Force Motors Ltd., challenged an order of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award in Wage Reference Due to Failure to Apply Settled Principles. The Court Remands the Proceedings for Fresh Adjudication, Holding That Both Region-cum-Industry and Parity Principles Were Not Properly Followed.

6 Dec 2006

This judgment from the Bombay High Court concerns three writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage reference between Hin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Disputes Act Case. Employer Failed to Prove Valid Closure or Compliance with Section 25-H for Re-employment After Restarting Factory.

3 May 2021

The petitioner, Meltron Engineering Industries, challenged an award of the Labour Court at Pune in a reference under Section 12(5) of the Industrial D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Found Illegal Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Full Back Wages Granted as Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions Renders Retrenchment Void.

2 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by workmen against Kirloskar Ebara Pumps Ltd. challenging the Labour Court's award dated 30th April ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in Retrenchment Dispute, Examining Scope of Industrial Tribunal's Jurisdiction. Key Issues Include Whether Tribunal Could Determine Legality Under Section 25F When Reference Limited to Justifiability of Retrenchment.

9 Mar 2005

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of seven workmen by M/s DBH International Ltd., a clearing and forwarding agen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against ESI Court Order Holding Lessor as Principal Employer for ESI Dues. Dispute Involves Whether Lessor Liable Under Section 93-A of Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948 for Dues of Lessee's Employees.

15 Jun 2022

The appeal arose from the dismissal of an application by the Employee State Insurance Court, Nagpur, which upheld the recovery proceedings initiated b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal. The court held that the burden to prove abandonment lies on the employer and that termination without notice or compensation under Section 25F is void.

20 Dec 2013

The judgment arises from two writ petitions: Writ Petition No.248 of 2011 filed by Kamala Mills Limited challenging the order of the 1st Labour Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Delivers Judgment in Letters Patent Appeal and Writ Petition Involving Reinstatement of Apprentice Workers at Public Sector Undertaking. Decision Addresses Issues of Res Judicata, Definition of Workman under Industrial Disputes Act, and Applicability of Recruitment Rules in Light of Umadevi.

30 Oct 2018

This matter arises from a long-standing industrial dispute between Nashik Workers Union ('the Union') and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited ('HAL'), a pub...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Implementation of Permanency Benefits to Workers of Dapchari Milk Project under MRTU & PULP Act. The court held that an earlier judgment granting permanency was enforceable through a fresh complaint and directed the respondents to grant benefits within three months.

2 Apr 2024

The petitioners, three workers representing 32 employees of the Dapchari Milk Project, filed a writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's dismis...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)