Search Results for "Village Panchayat Act, 1959"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificates — Holds That Disqualification Under Section 10(1A) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing and Cannot Be Automatic.

The petitioners, three women elected as Sarpanch and Members of Gram Panchayat Kshetra Mahuli, challenged an order dated 11th February 2025 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Leasing Government Land to Society Where He Was President and Trustee. Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Indirect Interest in Contract Leads to Disqualification.

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Village Waghunde (Khurd), filed an application under Section 14(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No Confidence Motion Despite Prior Resignation. Resignation Not Effective Until Approval by Panchayat Samiti, No Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Chandrakant Bapuso Rugge, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat, Tamdalge. He tendered his resignation on 17 August 2012, addressed to the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...