Search Results for "Vesting Notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Vesting Notification"

342 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 342 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Land. Court holds that the date of publication of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is the relevant date for determining market value, and that the claimant is entitled to compensation for the entire acquired land including the portion used for the road.

9 Dec 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by M/s. Mumbai Nasik Express Way Limited (the appellant/original defendant) against the judgment of the Refere...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 Not Lapsed Despite Non-Completion of Scheme. Possession Taken and Award Passed, No Abandonment or Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

1 Aug 2025

The appellant, Sri M. Rajappa, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case: Deposit of Compensation with Reference Court Constitutes Payment Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The Court held that where compensation is deposited with the Reference Court due to ownership disputes, it satisfies the payment requirement and prevents lapse of acquisition.

1 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against a High Court order declaring that the acquisition of land had lapsed unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

24 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration. Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Held Independent of Declaration Under Section 4, Not Barred by Interim Order.

1 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, challenged the acquisition of their property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

1 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KIADB Land Acquisition Notification — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Title or Possession Over Disputed Land. The court held that the petitioner, a company, had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition as it was neither the owner nor in possession of the land, and the notification under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 was validly issued.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Engineering (Pvt) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enforcement Committee Decision in Textile Quota Fraud Case. Petitioner Found to Have Forged Visas and Fabricated Bank Realisation Certificates to Obtain Premium Quota.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Minar Exports, challenged a decision of the Enforcement Committee constituted under a notification dated 12 November 1999 by the ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)