Search Results for "Unauthorized occupant"

206 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 206 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Locking and Sealing Notice Under Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. The petitioner challenged a notice directing de-occupation of premises within seven days for alleged unauthorized construction deviations under the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. P. Kavitha, claimed to be the absolute owner of a property measuring 2420 sq. ft. at Plot No. 10, Thangam Colony 1st Street, Anna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. Court upholds MHADA's jurisdiction to evict unauthorized occupants from transit accommodation under Section 3M of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 16 individuals who were occupants of transit accommodation in a building known as 'Sukh Sadan' in Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Allowing Retention of Government Accommodation for Transferred Employee Until Alternate Accommodation Provided. Transfer of civilian employee does not warrant immediate eviction without ensuring alternate accommodation.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and other petitioners against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Bangalore Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Challenge to Cancellation of NOC for Redevelopment Due to Misrepresentation of Tenant Status. Landlord's Failure to Disclose Correct Residential Status of Tenants Renders Permission Void Ab Initio Under DCR 33(7) and MHADA Act.

The petitioners, Dahyabhai Papers & Boards Pvt. Ltd. and another, owned a dilapidated cessed building in Mumbai. They applied for redevelopment under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Under Article 227 Against Revisional Order Upholding Eviction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Licensee Company Challenges Jurisdiction, Arguing Non-Applicability of Act Due to Paid-Up Capital Exceeding Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 3(1)(b).

Background: The matter involves a dispute between licensors (owners of a flat in Galaxy Apartments, Bandra) and a licensee company (petitioner no. 1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Consider Regularization Applications Before Demolition in Mall Mezzanine Case. Occupants of Mall Entitled to Submit Regularization Application Under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act Due to Delayed Action by Corporation.

The petitioners, occupants of a mall called 'Dreams the Mall' in Bhandup-West, challenged a notice issued under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 41 Agriculturists Challenging Eviction from Government Land Leased to Maharashtra State Farming Corporation. Petitioners Failed to Establish Tenancy Rights Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and Were Held to Be Encroachers.

The petitioners, 41 individuals, filed a writ petition challenging their eviction from land in Rastapur, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar. The land ...