Search Results for "Taluk Survey"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Injunction Against Disturbance of Possession of Grama Natham Land. Writ Petition Not Maintainable as It Involves Civil Rights and a Civil Suit is Already Pending.

The petitioner, S. Mani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus or any ot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representations for Revenue Entries in Land Grant Cases. Petitioners' claim for revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits to be considered by Tahsildar within three months.

The petitioners, Sri Ulluraiah, Smt Siddagangamma, and Sri Lingappa, filed separate writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Tribunal Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner failed to explain 31-year delay in challenging occupancy rights granted to respondent under Karnataka Land Reforms Act.

The petitioner, Upendra Nayak, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ban...