Search Results for "Tahsildar Office"

1085 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1085 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Mamlatdar's Courts Act Orders Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Substantive Findings. Tahsildar's Order Granting Way Access Under Section 5 Set Aside as Applications Failed to Specify Obstruction Details and Panchnamas Were Conducted Without Proper Notice.

The dispute concerned proceedings under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 regarding access to agricultural lands. The petitioners were landowners whose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unnatural Conduct of Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 506 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rahul Limbaji Thorat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Vandana under Sections 302 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Subsequent FIR in Land Dispute — Abuse of Process Under Section 482 CrPC. Second FIR on identical allegations as earlier FIR quashed as not maintainable.

The applicant, Mohammad Hisham Osmani, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing ...