Search Results for "Sub-Lease"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Cooperative Court's Order Terminating Lease for Violation of Bye-laws in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute. Leasehold rights terminated due to unauthorized construction and sub-letting without society's consent; purchasers' rights held subject to society's bye-laws.

The dispute pertains to leasehold rights over a plot in Vithalnagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. The society granted a lease of the plot to membe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay examines Official Liquidator’s report for declaration of sub-lease executed by lessee as void. The matter involves sub-lease of company property during pendency of winding up, with allegations of fabricated documents.

The matter concerns an Official Liquidator’s report filed in the winding up of Modi Stone Limited, seeking a declaration that a sub-lease dated 20 M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Reduces Mesne Profits Interest Rate. Court holds that interest on mesne profits should be at 6% per annum under Section 34 CPC, not 18% as awarded by trial court.

The appellant, Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 by the trial c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Payment for shrink-wrapped software held to be for copyright article, not transfer of copyright rights, thus not taxable as royalty.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)) against the common order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty. Payment for purchase of shrink-wrapped software from non-resident held not royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as no copyright transferred.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appella...