Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

1126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Assessment on Flat Purchase Agreements. Agreements for sale of flats in a building under construction are agreements to sell, not conveyances, and stamp duty is to be assessed on the consideration stated in the agreement, not on market value.

The petitioner, M/s. Padmavati Construction Co., a partnership firm, was developing a plot of land in Chembur, Mumbai. The registered owner, Bombay Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Consider Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Unconsummated Sale Agreement Due to Covid-19 Pandemic. Petitioner entitled to refund under Section 52 read with 52A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as no instrument was executed and transaction fell through.

The petitioner, Deepti Kavit Ved, desired to purchase Flat No.707, 'B' Wing, Nishchy Building for a total consideration of Rs.74 Lakhs from M/s. Shree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses LIC's Appeal on Stamp Duty for Insurance Policies in Rajasthan. State Has Legislative Competence Under Concurrent List to Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies, But Relief Granted on Facts.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which upheld th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit for Non-Compliance with Stamp Duty Provisions. Court directs payment of ten times deficit stamp duty on unstamped agreement for sale under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioners, defendants 2 and 3 in OS No.3/2011 pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Sirsi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sub-Registrar's Endorsement Rejecting Sale Certificate as Time-Barred Under Section 89 of Registration Act, 1908. Petitioner Purchased Property in SARFAESI Auction, Bank Forwarded Certificate Late but Court Held No Limitation for Registration Under Section 89(4).

The petitioner, M/s. MGM Pooja Buildtech Private Limited, purchased a property (Plot No.108, Metagali, K.R.S. Road, Mysore, measuring 4,056 sq. meters...