ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
Search Results for "Simultaneous holding"
279 result(s) found
Found 279 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Waqf Tribunal's Interim Order in Property Dispute. The Revision Application Raised Jurisdictional Question Regarding the Competence of a Single-Member Tribunal After the 2013 Amendment to the Waqf Act, Without a Transitory Provision.
11 Sep 2015The case arose from a civil revision under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, filed by the original defendants (Magnum Developers and others) challe...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.
9 Mar 2017The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...
- 81
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.
4 Mar 2020The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...
- 210
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Closure of HAL Airport for Commercial Operations. Concession Agreement for Bangalore International Airport Held Valid and Not Contrary to Public Interest.
16 Dec 2015The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) challenging the closure of HAL Airport (Bangalore) for commerc...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Departmental Inquiry During Pendency of Criminal Case. Held that departmental inquiry can proceed simultaneously with criminal trial as standards of proof differ, and no automatic stay arises from registration of criminal case.
23 Dec 2011The petitioner, Ramesh Sonawane, a Junior Manager with Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., was involved in a criminal case under ...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Matter — Profit on Sale of Shares Held as Business Income and Not Capital Accretion. The Profit from Sale of Shares Held as Stock-in-Trade is Taxable as Business Income under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Even If Part of Sale Price Attributable to Controlling Interest.
28 Nov 1967The assessee, a private limited company, was engaged in share trading. From 1942 to 1948, it regularly dealt in shares of Elphinstone Mills, treating ...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Remand in Cross-Case Assault Matter. Appellate Court's Direction to Try Case and Counter Case Together Upheld to Avoid Conflicting Findings Under Section 401 CrPC.
2 Jul 2026The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Nilesh Nagawade, the original complainant, against the judgment of the Additional Sessions ...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Dispute Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — License Held for Residential Purpose. The court restored the eviction order of the Competent Authority, holding that the license was for residential purpose and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
12 Nov 2024The Petitioner, Deepak S. Kavadiya, is the owner of Flat No. A/1102, Juhu Griha Swapna CHSL, JVPD, Juhu, Vile Parle West, Mumbai-400056. Respondent No...
- 2604
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Defence Witness Summons and Directs Simultaneous Trial of Counter Cases. Accused in Sessions Case for Offences Under IPC and SC/ST Act Successfully Argued That Denial of Defence Witnesses Violates Fair Trial, and Counter Cases Must Be Tried Together as Per Supreme Court Precedent.
10 May 2018The petitioners, accused in Sessions Case No. 77 of 2013 for offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preve...
- 66
