Search Results for "Shopkeepers"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Based on Will Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The Regular Second Appeal was filed by the defendant-appellant against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employees Challenging Employer's Circular Requiring Unvaccinated Employees to Undergo Periodic RT-PCR Tests at Own Cost. The court held that the employer's circular was a reasonable public health measure and not violative of fundamental rights.

The petitioners, employees of Mumbai Port Trust (MPT), challenged a circular dated 15 June 2021 that required unvaccinated employees to undergo RT-PCR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Grant of Bail and Inadequate Material to Establish 'Habitual' Bootlegger

The petitioner, Kashinath Motiram Chavan, challenged a detention order dated 23 March 2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Criminal Antecedents Without Evidence of Public Order Disturbance.

The petitioner, Ashok Kisan Jadhav, challenged his detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Members Challenging Complaint Against No-Confidence Motion. No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Upheld Despite Pending Appeal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Mahadulla, moved a no-confidence motion against Sarpanch Smt. Nirmala Bonde on 5-8-2006, which was ...