Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employees Challenging Employer's Circular Requiring Unvaccinated Employees to Undergo Periodic RT-PCR Tests at Own Cost. The court held that the employer's circular was a reasonable public health measure and not violative of fundamental rights.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, employees of Mumbai Port Trust (MPT), challenged a circular dated 15 June 2021 that required unvaccinated employees to undergo RT-PCR tests every ten days at their own cost to attend office, and restricted their medical benefits for COVID-19 treatment. The petitioners argued that vaccination is voluntary and the circular was discriminatory. The court, after hearing submissions, held that the circular was a reasonable measure in the interest of public health and safety. The court noted that the employer has a duty to ensure a safe workplace and that the conditions imposed were not punitive but aimed at protecting all employees. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the circular.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Health - Employer's Duty - Article 21, Article 47 - The court held that the employer has a duty to ensure a safe workplace and that the impugned circular is a reasonable measure to protect the health of all employees and the public. The right to health of the collective outweighs the individual choice of not getting vaccinated. (Paras 1-20)

B) Service Law - Employer's Policy - Conditions for Unvaccinated Employees - The court held that the employer can impose conditions such as periodic RT-PCR tests at employee's cost and restriction of medical benefits for COVID-19 treatment on unvaccinated employees, as these are not punitive but protective measures. (Paras 2-15)

C) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Article 14 - The court held that the classification between vaccinated and unvaccinated employees is reasonable and based on an intelligible differentia, as unvaccinated employees pose a higher risk to the workplace. (Paras 3-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Mumbai Port Trust's Circular dated 15 June 2021, which imposes conditions on unvaccinated employees including mandatory RT-PCR tests at their own cost and restriction of medical benefits for COVID-19 treatment, is valid and not violative of fundamental rights.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the petition, upholding the impugned circular dated 15 June 2021.

Law Points

  • Right to health
  • employer's duty to ensure safe workplace
  • reasonable restrictions on fundamental rights
  • public health measures
  • vaccination as voluntary but with consequences
  • non-discrimination
  • Article 21
  • Article 47
  • Article 14
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 95

Writ Petition (L) No.17132 of 2021

2021-12-21

S.J. Kathawalla, Abhay Ahuja

Ms. Aditi Saxena for Petitioners, Mr. Rajul Jain with Ms. Aasiya Khan i/by HSA Advocates for Respondent No.1, Mr. D.P. Singh for Union of India, Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocate, Amicus Curiae

Deepak Kumar Radheshyam Khurana and Others

Mumbai Port Trust and Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging employer's circular imposing conditions on unvaccinated employees.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the impugned circular dated 15 June 2021 issued by Mumbai Port Trust.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, employees of Mumbai Port Trust, challenged the circular requiring unvaccinated employees to undergo RT-PCR tests at own cost and restricting medical benefits for COVID-19 treatment.

Issues

Whether the impugned circular is violative of Article 14, Article 21, and Article 47 of the Constitution of India. Whether the employer can impose conditions on unvaccinated employees in the interest of public health.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that vaccination is voluntary and the circular is discriminatory. Respondents argued that the circular is a reasonable measure to ensure workplace safety and public health.

Ratio Decidendi

The employer has a duty to ensure a safe workplace and can impose reasonable conditions on unvaccinated employees to protect public health. The right to health of the collective outweighs individual choice in the context of a pandemic.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners are employees of the Mumbai Port Trust (“MPT”). The Petitioners have impugned MPT’s Circular dated 15th June, 2021... It is common ground that a majority of the Petitioners are not fully vaccinated against Covid-19 and they have chosen not to owing to personal reasons.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the circular dated 15 June 2021. The court reserved judgment on 10 November 2021 and pronounced on 21 December 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 21, Article 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Proper Notice. The court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 64(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 by set...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Applicants in Bigamy Case for Lack of Essential Ingredients of Section 494 IPC. The complaint did not allege that the applicants performed any marriage or had knowledge of the first marriage, making the issua...