Search Results for "Sharad Sarda Case"

436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Judgment on Appeals Against Acquittal in Murder and Forgery Case; Circumstantial Evidence Scrutinized

The High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench heard two criminal appeals against the judgment of acquittal dated 26-10-2017 passed by the III Additional D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Unproven Extra Judicial Confession. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant challenging his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC and destruction of evidence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Evaluates State Appeal Against Acquittal of 17 Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Acquitted Accused of Charges Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302, 201, 114 r/w 149 IPC Citing Insufficient Evidence.

The case arose from the alleged murder of Madhusudan Reddy on 27.05.2010 in Chitradurga. The prosecution claimed that due to previous enmity, 17 accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence Under Section 302 IPC. Conviction Overturned as Last-Seen Testimony and Recoveries Failed to Form a Complete Chain Excluding Innocence, Applying Principles from Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reconsiders Appellant’s Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence; Handwriting Expert Opinion Under Scrutiny. Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Challenged on Grounds That Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Expert Evidence Not Corroborated.

The appellant, Vikas Ramdas Khairnar Patil, preferred a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against his conviction and life imprisonment for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Dispute Over Love Marriage. Allegations Involved Stabbing of Daughter and Son-in-Law by Family Members Under Sections 302, 307, 342 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the conviction of appellants—Amarjeetsingh (brother), Jagtars...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Weapon Not Linked to Accused; Last Seen and Motive Not Proved.

The present appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Gadchiroli, convicting the appellant for offences under Sections 302, 392, and 201 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder by Electric Shock. Accused Challenged Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration, Arguing Accidental Electrocution.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...