Search Results for "Sections 302, 392, 201"

Trending :

Search Results for "Sections 302, 392, 201"

83 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Rape and Murder of Young Woman in Maharashtra — Conviction Based on DNA Evidence and Circumstantial Links. The Court held that the chain of circumstantial evidence, including last seen together and DNA matching, was complete and consistent with the guilt of the appellant, and the case fell within the 'rarest of rare' category for imposition of death penalty.

20 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which had uph...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and Arson Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen together, recovery of stolen gold chain, and DNA matching on appellant's clothes established guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302, 449, 392/397, 436, and 201 IPC.

21 Oct 2022

The appellant, Shivdatta @ Biltu Subhodchandra Sah, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Bharat Panjiyara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 460, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

10 Jun 2022

The appellant, Roshan Anant Sawant, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg-Oros, for the murder of Alakamai Atmaram Sawant, an elderly woman ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302/364/392/394/201 IPC set aside as chain of circumstances was incomplete.

28 Mar 2022

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar, along with co-accused Mange Ram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, Haryana, for offences under Se...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial evidence failed to establish chain of circumstances pointing to guilt of accused beyond reasonable doubt in murder and robbery case under Sections 302, 392, 201 read with 34 IPC.

11 Jan 2019

The State of Goa, through Mapusa Police Station, filed an appeal against the acquittal of four respondents (Pravin Patel, Vithal Gondhali, Madhukar Ai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392 r/w 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

2 Nov 2018

The appellant, Madhukara @ Madhu @ Mallesha, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Shimoga in S.C. No. 78/2012 for offences punisha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Weapon Not Linked to Accused; Last Seen and Motive Not Proved.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Gadchiroli, convicting the appellant for offences under Sections 302, 392, and 201 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Furlough Rejection Case — Rule 313(2) Goa Prison Rules, 2006 Held Directory. Convict Under Section 392 IPC Not Automatically Barred From Furlough; Long Incarceration and Good Conduct Considered.

12 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Anthony Rebello, a life convict serving sentence at Central Jail Colvale, Goa, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High C...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Filed by Employees of Survey Sections in Various Tahsildar Offices. Relief Sought and Final Decision Not Specified in Available Text.

26 Feb 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)