Search Results for "Section 25(3) Limitation Act"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Valid Despite Non-Examination of Attesting Witness. Execution of sale deed can be proved by other evidence under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 when attesting witness is dead.

The appellant-plaintiff, Sri Thammaiah, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction (later amended to possession) in respect of sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay and Setting Aside Abatement in Second Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Legal heirs failed to explain delay of over 5 years in seeking restoration of appeal after appellant's death.

The present litigation arises from a second appeal filed in 1994 which was disposed of as abated on 20.07.2012 due to the death of the sole appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages for Delayed and Undelivered LPG Cylinders. Arbitrator's interpretation of contractual clauses upheld as not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. R.M. Cylinders Private Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 30 August 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of...