Search Results for "Section 248"

515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement to Sell Dated 09.01.2012 Proved, Readiness and Willingness Established, and Limitation Issue Rejected.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the defendants (appellants) against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for Non-Taking of Possession and Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Initiated in 1965 Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Deemed Lapsed as Neither Possession Taken Nor Compensation Paid.

The petitioner, Joaquim Victor Fernandes, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings for his plot No. 34 admeasuring...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...