Search Results for "Section 23A"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Suit Dismissed as Barred by Limitation. Trial Court's Finding of Limitation Upheld; Decree for Refund Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 01.09.2004 and a final agreement dated 19.11.2004 between the plaintiff (respondent) and the defenda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Concluded Contract via Email Exchange. Unsigned Memorandum of Understanding Not Binding as Parties Did Not Intend to Be Bound Until Execution of Formal Agreement.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of a flat owned by the respondent (orig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Directs Deposit of Mesne Profits at Agreed Rate. Tenant at sufferance liable to pay mesne profits at market rate from date of termination of tenancy under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, claimed ownership of suit premises and alleged that the respondent-defendant was a tenant at will under an unregi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Abatement of Appeal in Rent Control Ejectment Suit. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives on Record Within Limitation Leads to Dismissal of Appeal as Abated.

The petitioners, heirs of the original plaintiff Ramsukh Mishrilal Jadiya, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 23/12/2010 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Decree for Specific Performance Set Aside as Plaintiff Did Not Show Continuous Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the order of the Extra Adhoc District Judge, Kelapur, dated 19.1.2011, in Regular Civil Appeal No.181 ...