Search Results for "Section 124-A Railways Act"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Railway Compensation Appeal Under Railways Act Due to Intoxication Exclusion

The High Court dismissed an appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for railway injury -- The appellant claimed compens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Amputation of Both Legs. Initial Burden of Proof Discharged by Affidavit; Ticket Loss Explained.

The appellant, Atul Tandekar, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a train acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deceased's Fall While Alighting Train at Non-Stoppage Station Held to be Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989. Negligence of Deceased Not a Defense Under Section 124A; Legal Heirs Entitled to Compensation.

The appeal arises from the rejection of a claim petition by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, in Case No. OA(IIu)NGP/2013/0331. The deceased, Arjun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways' Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Case. Death of Passenger Due to Fall from Train Caused by Sudden Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railways) against an award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, in Claim Application No.16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Untoward Incident Death Claim — Compensation of Rs.4,00,000 Upheld. Deceased fell from moving train while boarding with valid ticket; Railway failed to prove exception under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, South Western Railway, Hubli, against the order dated 29.06.2009 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Holds That 'Accidental Falling' Includes Falling Due to Dizziness or Fits, Not Only Bumping Against Objects. Tribunal Erred in Narrow Interpretation of 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Arvind Sanas, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased. Deceased was a pillion rider on motorcycle hit by truck; court held that mere presence of pillion rider on motorcycle does not imply contributory negligence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased pillion rider. The deceased was riding as...