Search Results for "Section 124 Customs Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 124 Customs Act"

262 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release of Sealed Factory Premises in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Comply with Supreme Court's Conditional Order. Interest Demand Under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 is Statutory and Automatic, No Separate Demand Required.

14 Nov 2024

The petitioner, B.V. Jewels, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold and jewellery, operates an export processing unit in SEEPZ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.

23 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Confiscation Order for Used Haemodialysis Machines — Import Not Prohibited Under Hazardous Waste Rules. Used Medical Equipment Not Classifiable as 'Hazardous Waste' or 'Waste' Under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-Boundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

30 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Hemant Surgical Industries Limited, is engaged in importing, manufacturing, and supplying medical equipment. Since 2008, it has import...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Return of Seized Goods Under Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Due to Failure to Issue Show Cause Notice Within One Year. The court held that seizure becomes illegal if no notice under Section 124(a) is issued within one year, and extension orders passed after expiry of one year are invalid.

3 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. AM Prototyping Labs Pvt. Ltd., imported a Flashforge WaxJet 400 3D Prototyping Machine along with accessories, valued at Rs.26,44...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016

14 Dec 2016

The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice Against Director in Customs Duty Recovery Case – Recovery Provision Under Section 142 Cannot Be Invoked Against Non-Defaulter. Attachment of Director's Personal Property Set Aside as She Was Not Adjudged Liable Under Customs Act, 1962.

9 Jan 2013

Suman N. Agarwal, a director of Nisum Global Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice of demand dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Customs Appeal in Vessel Confiscation Case — Reduces Fine from Rs.1 Crore to Rs.5 Lakh Upheld as Not Perverse. Court holds that reduction of fine for confiscated vessel and setting aside of fine for mixed diesel are based on evidence and not arbitrary under Customs Act, 1962.

3 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 5 August 2008 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Under Customs Act for Import of Rough Diamonds — Cites Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence of Misdeclaration. The court held that the show cause notice was vague and the department failed to prove mens rea for penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.

9 Mar 2010

The petitioners, M/s SU.Jewels Exim Pvt. Ltd. and its director, imported rough and uncut diamonds from Dubai during April-May 2003. The diamonds were ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)