Search Results for "Section 11A Land Acquisition Act 1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Section 11A Land Acquisition Act 1894"

115 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

30 Jan 2026

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.

10 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions and Bank's Intervention Application — Compensation Determined Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court held that the Reference Court must consider market value as on the date of notification under Section 11 of the 1894 Act, and that the bank as mortgagee has a right to be heard in compensation proceedings.

16 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by landowners (Sandesh Vitthal Thakur and others, Dipen Vadodaria, Sharad K Vasant, and M/s. Virat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions for Katkari Tribe Members Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Held That Landowners Are Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 26(1)(b) and Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the Act, and That the Acquisition Proceedings Were Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Katkari Scheduled Tribe and other landowners challenging the compensation awarde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Proceedings Deemed Lapsed as Award Was Not Made Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration.

16 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Haribhau Narayan Chikane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition award ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan Under MRTP Act, With Public Interest Justifying Acquisition Despite Property Owners' Objections.

2 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai's efforts to acquire portions of the appellants' property for constructing a link road...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Land Acquisition Lapse Challenge Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners, landowners, argued that acquisition for BTM Layout had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, and the appeals arose from a Single Judge's common order dated 14.12.2017.

19 Apr 2021

The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellants, landowners and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellants Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Land Acquisition Under KIAD Act Upheld as Appellants Were Not Owners and Compensation Was Already Paid to Recorded Owner.

17 Aug 2020

The appellants, Sri K. Srinivas Murthy and Smt S.V. Padma, filed a writ appeal against the order of a Single Judge dismissing their writ petition chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales. The court directed reassessment of compensation considering industrial potential and comparable sales.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners from Takalghat, Hingna, Nagpur, challenging the compensation awarded by the Spe...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)