Search Results for "Recreational Open Space"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Encroachment on Government Land — Interpretation of Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 Requires Encroachment to be on Government Land as Defined Under Land Revenue Code.

The petitioner, Sau. Seema w/o Ramesh Khule, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gawandgaon in October 2017. Respondent No.4, Nandu s/o Bhikaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan for School and Playground. Court upholds allotment as consistent with development plan reservation and public interest.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Dr. Surendra Ramlal Tiwari and Trimurty Nagar Ground Bachav Kruti Samiti challenging the allot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...