Search Results for "Reappointment"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Appointment of Respondent No. 3 in Executive Engineer Post Due to Non-Compliance with Selection Committee Merit List. Appointment Order Issued Contrary to the Merit List Prepared by the Expert Committee Violates Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Jatinkumar Bhikhabhai Kalathiya, applied for the post of Executive Engineer (Civil) pursuant to an advertisement issued by Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Principal's Appointment in UGC Regulations Case — API Score Requirement Not Applicable to Already Working Principal Under Clause 4.2.0(iv).

The petitioner, Dr. Mohd. Asif Nabi Sheikh, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondent no.3, Shyam Bhojraj Punde, as Principal of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Double Punishment for Furlough Overstay — No Violation of Double Jeopardy as Remission Cut and Non-Reappointment as Convict Overseer Are Not Punishments Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Wilson Benjamin Castellino, a convict, was released on furlough on 19.11.2010 and was required to surrender on 4.12.2010. He failed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging State Circulars on Reservation in Public Services for Lack of Maintainability. Petitioners Must First Approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal Under Section 15 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging certain circulars issued by the State Government concerning reservatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Junior Clerk for Habitual Lateness in Judicial Service. Disciplinary action for repeated late attendance held proportionate and not violative of natural justice.

The petitioner, Mr. Rahul Suresh Kulkarni, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in the Civil Court at Karad on 11 July 2005. He worked for 118 days until 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Temporary Teaching Staff Seeking Reinstatement and Regularisation — Temporary Appointments Do Not Confer Right to Continue. Termination of Ad Hoc Employees on Expiry of Term Is Not Illegal and No Writ Lies for Enforcement of Contract of Personal Service.

The petitioners, seven individuals employed as Assistant Professors and Lecturers at Shri Bhagwan College of Pharmacy, Aurangabad, filed a writ petiti...