Search Results for "RSA Section 100"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Money Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to establish substantial question of law regarding loan transaction and repayment.

The appellant, Sri M M Deverajgowda, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Rent and Business Income Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Section 100 CPC Appeal Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The appellant, H.V. Devarajanaidu, was the defendant in O.S.No.312/2016 filed by the respondent, A.V. Ramesh Babu, for recovery of business income and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement to Sell Dated 09.01.2012 Proved, Readiness and Willingness Established, and Limitation Issue Rejected.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the defendants (appellants) against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court and first appellate court decrees dismissing suit for declaration and possession, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a suit for declaration of title and possession f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The appellant, Sri Bylamurthy, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Trial and First Appellate Court Upheld. Agreement of Sale Proved by Plaintiff, Defendants Failed to Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants (defendants) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments...