Search Results for "RCC buildings"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Demolition of Dilapidated Chawl for Non-Compliance with Interim Orders. Petitioners Failed to Provide Structural Stability Certificate and Alternative Accommodation as Directed, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition Under Article 226.

The petitioners, five individuals residing in a chawl in Dahisar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010005522012_1

...