Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Procuration Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Inducement. Conviction Under Section 366A IPC Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent to Force or Seduce Victim to Illicit Intercourse.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Laxmibai, by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 278 of 1995 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 376, 366, 363, 443 & 506(2) IPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rape Based on Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix — Absence of Injury Not Fatal. Testimony of prosecutrix found trustworthy and unshaken; conviction under Section 376 IPC confirmed.

The present criminal appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court affirming the conviction of the appellant under Sections 376 and 323 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Sunil Kashinath Shelke, was convicted by the learned District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.41 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Based Solely on Prosecutrix's Testimony Unsustainable Where Medical and FSL Reports Do Not Support Prosecution Case.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar against the State of Bihar, setting aside his conviction under Sections 376(1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 69 of 2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli. The appellant in Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Accused in Rape Case Under Sections 342 and 376 IPC. Prosecution Failed to Establish Identity of Accused and Corroborate Testimony of Minor Victim.

The State of Maharashtra challenged the acquittal of Ravindra Kashinath Ghodke by the First Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions Case...